Ad

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in an 8-1 decision that the strip search of an Arizona teen was unconstitutional.

The court determined that the strip search was not warranted to look for prescription strength ibuprofen.  The 13-year-old student was found not to be hiding the pills, despite the search.

The entire story is located here.  It's important to note that the court has previously recognized the need to search lockers, backpacks, or purses.  It's the degree of the search here that went over the line.

Have you read the ruling?  What are your opinions on it?

You must be a member of this group to post a reply. Join

Parent Replies to "Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case"

RSS View 5 replies: Newest-Oldest, Oldest-Newest
Display all replies
MagnetMom
MagnetMom June 26, 2009
Re: Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case
healthy11,

I can definitely see that as a form of retaliation as well. This case started as one where a boy was sick supposedly from taking pills, a girl was found with pills that she then claimed she got from the claimant. After searching her backpack, then they sought a strip search.

To me, the minute they realized the accused girl didn't have anything in her backpack, they should have gone back to the girl who was carrying the pills, and not harassed a girl that no one else had claimed was involved.

I would have even been ok with calling the parents in and deciding what to do next, but there was no reason to perform such a search.
healthy11
healthy11 June 26, 2009
Re: Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case
My understanding was that another student "reported" the girl had drugs. Without a clear ruling against strip searches, I can imagine bullies at that school who wanted to embarass other kids would be making completely unfounded "reports" all the time.
MSMomm
MSMomm June 26, 2009
Re: Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case
I feel the same way. As a parent, I would know (I hope) that I could trust my child, and I would know what I gave my child in the morning.

This issue is especially tough for girls. And schools want a doctor's note for every medication being brought to school. But, to play devil's advocate, some kids bring things to school that look harmless (like a Tic-Tac), but are really drugs. I guess schools are trying to be on the safe side of things as much as they can be.
MagnetMom
MagnetMom June 26, 2009
Re: Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case
I agree, MSMomm,

If this had been about a weapon or something serious, I'd understand the necessity, but this was about Advil.

I've never been comfortable with the idea that teens can't take regular OTC meds for pain or colds without fear of being expelled. Teen girls shouldn't have to go to the nurse with cramps. I realize this was for a possibly prescription strength, but that's the equivalent of 4 Advil in one tab, which is far less than most adults carry daily.
MSMomm
MSMomm June 26, 2009
Re: Supreme Court Decides in Strip Search Case
I would agree that the strip-search of this 13 year-old girl was uncalled for. And, the principal made the girl wait in the office for several hours after the strip search, which was also uncalled for.

Any contributed content above is the subjective opinion of that member or external author, and not of GreatSchools. GreatSchools does not check for accuracy in community posts or verify the contributor’s identity. If you are searching for health-related advice we strongly suggest you seek professional medical support. View our Community Guidelines for more details.

Local Q&A

Top cities

Browse questions about

Local Q&A is brand new! What do you think? Give us your feedback in our feedback forum.
AD
AD
Join the community or login
Join the community or
Read our community guidelines and FAQ
Community Moderator
Email the Community Moderator for help
tracker