Awarding Tenure - Is It Making Bad Teachers Hard To Fire?
I came across this article at USA Today regarding the difficulties in firing unqualified teachers once they become tenured.
I agree that some form of tenure should exist as a protective measure to ensure that teachers cannot be fired from a job arbitrarily, however in most states, the process is so convoluted and complicated, it's nearly impossible and costly for the districts to go through the necessary steps.
Teacher reviews and/or evaluations are often done sparingly and very few teachers receive negative evaluations from the principals of their schools due to the fear of dealing with a lengthy grievance policy or litigation.
We need to reform this system, perhaps by the inclusion of more input by their peers and parents, as well as designing a process that allows fundamental employment rights to the teachers, but placing a stronger emphasis on accountability and removing the mechanisms slows down and makes the process costly for the districts to pursue.
What do you think some possible solutions are? Can we realistically offer tenure without bloating our school systems with bad teachers? What changes do you think can be made to the tenure system?





Parent Replies to "Awarding Tenure - Is It Making Bad Teachers Hard To Fire?"
Display all replies